PERFORMANCE: The Actors' Roundtable: "Company vs. Solo"


Each week, Paden Fallis poses one question to a group of professional working actors from a variety of backgrounds. Our goal is not to demystify the work of the actor or explore their careers, but to dig a bit deeper into their artistic working process. ACTOR’S ROUNDTABLE: COMPANY VS. SOLOI overheard two actors talking about the benefits and drawbacks of an actor working with a company versus on their own. The company actor enjoys the assurance of roles given to them through the company season. Consequently, he or she does not have to worry about “hustling” just to land a job. The solo actor has no guarantees of employment, as they spend a lot of their time simply trying to procure work. The downside for the company actor might be that a degree of lethargy and “taking things for granted” might imbue their work with less urgency. The positives, though, mean that with less worry about unemployment, they might have more energy and focus with each role. However, the solo actor, scraping and clawing for each and every job, might have a more acute hunger, appreciate the work more, and deliver a stronger performance. At the same time, he might find himself fighting the negative energy that associates itself with constant unemployment. Assurance of work vs. lack of security. Which breeds better work? |